The Four Spent the Day Together by author Chris Kraus β A Renowned Writer Explores Fresh Territory
This latest work features individuals seeking clean slates, attempting to leave behind drugs or toxic relationships, only to witness hope devolve into conflict. Chris Kraus often employs the phrase "fresh start", transforming it into willfully cynical through recurring use. Examples include "He was ready for a new beginning" and "They decided to make a fresh start" recur in the story. And yet, Kraus herself seems to be making her own fresh start, as this presents as a new kind of book β observational, truly literary. But then it turns out to be laden with the familiar conflicts and styles as earlier books.
From Chance Novelist to Cult Classic
The writer was originally an creative who became a writer almost accidentally with her 1997 cult classic I Love Dick, structured as epistles to an unresponsive love interest, transforming personal female narrative from abjection into defiance. She kept producing books, but the next trio of fascinating and rebarbative novels did not possess the shock and immediacy that the correspondence format imparted to the voice of I Love Dick. Compounding this was her identity as a maverick maker who had turned into a major property owner, so there was considerable focus on real estate deals. It makes sense that she presently aims to try out different types of content, directing her gaze to the experiences of others, at a moment when she states that Trumpian politics makes confessional writing unnecessary.
Several Eras, Shared Inescapable History
The Four Spent the Day Together is divided into three sections, encompassing multiple eras β each trapped by their histories. We encounter the narrative about Emma and Jasper, based on the author's parents, transitioning from the urban environment to rural Connecticut. Then there is the narrative of the author, in the character of a figure named Catt Greene, confronting the delayed acclaim of I Love Dick, the ascent of a political figure, and her addict husband Paul. Finally the account of a killing of one lost young man by another in a locality long abandoned by liberal ideals only 80 miles from the protagonist's home in rural Minnesota.
As a reader fond of honed writing of the type Kraus herself often avoids, I was seduced by the novelistic voice of the initial segment.
As a reader drawn to honed writing of the variety that Kraus often disregards, I was won over by the storytelling approach of the first section. There is a novel degree of detail that makes room for trivial aspects, like the container that the protagonist as a child frees from the ice at the beginning of the narrative, helped by her cherished parent. "Look, an ice toy!" she says; "a lovely toy", he replies, "the ambiguous meanings of language circulating in their speech like hard candy". She tells Emma's story with curiosity and intimacy. "Emma felt like she'd stepped into a dream β not precisely her dream."
Frustration and Disruption
I was fated to feel let down when I wished this different style could last out the book. The author states here that she is annoyed by the satisfaction those who appreciate polished prose have taken from I Love Dick; she's dedicated to disjunction, to the unpolished style she shares with her idol writer Kathy Acker, and the blankness and repetitiveness of her earlier works comes back in the central part. Catt is attempting to do up multiple decrepit residences in Albuquerque's worst neighbourhoods while moving between Minnesota and LA, unable to aid Paul curb his addiction. She feels helpless as her spouse cycles through underfunded jobs as an substance abuse counselor in a society driven by the rage and anxiety that underpins a political win. There are several pages about Catt's social media ostracism on social media, her occupation changed from "novelist" to "landlord" on a reference site. She still gives the impression to be overly concerned about this. At one point she says that she's investigating the murder so that before exiting the region, "she could potentially understand something about an the nation that her online critics would not understand, would not even perceive".
The Murder Narrative
Then we reach to the murder itself β and the referenced day passed by the victim with the murderer and his associates. The author possesses great source material, and details moment by moment what occurred as the victim Brandon came to visit Brittney after encountering her on a platform where she sold sex pictures. He sought a sexual encounter but appears congenially to have passed the day in the company of her associates, mooching around fixing his automobile and covering the cost of food and substances, before being murdered by Brittney's boyfriend Micah β a young, mentally ill man who has repeatedly received inpatient care for aggressive outbursts.
Fascination and Incompletion
The protagonist becomes fixated by the narrative, and I was intrigued by the way that Kraus's dual urges towards ethical reporting and daring boundary-pushing clash in this segment. However, I would have preferred her to explore more thoroughly her individual preoccupations here. The standout figure is Brittney herself, who becomes vivid partly through Catt seeing herself in her β a similarly gifted, tormented individual going off the rails in a difficult, overlooked locality. Kraus notes that Catt converses with Brittney in jail, but she fails to enact these dialogues. This entire part feels strangely incomplete, to the extent that her narrative ends almost mid-par